Congress moves no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla amid House disruptions

The Congress on Tuesday escalated its confrontation with the ruling dispensation by submitting a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, citing alleged bias in the conduct of House proceedings. The move came amid continued disruptions during the Budget Session of Parliament, which has witnessed frequent adjournments over the past several days.

Chief Whip of the Congress in the Lok Sabha, K. Suresh, along with party Whip Jawed Ahmed, formally handed over the notice of the no-confidence motion to the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha on February 10, 2026. The submission took place as Opposition members raised slogans and protested in the House, demanding discussions on issues they claim are being repeatedly ignored.

Lok Sabha adjourned amid chaos

Soon after the notice was submitted, the Lok Sabha witnessed further disorder, forcing the Chair to adjourn proceedings until 2:00 pm. The repeated interruptions have significantly impacted legislative business during the ongoing Budget Session, with several key discussions either delayed or cut short.

Congress submits a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla amid disruptions in Parliament.

Opposition parties, led by the Congress, have alleged that the Speaker has selectively allowed debates while denying them adequate opportunities to raise pressing national concerns. They argue that the role of the Speaker should remain impartial and above party politics, a principle they claim has been compromised.

Opposition raises concerns over fairness

Congress leaders said the decision to move a no-confidence motion was taken after multiple attempts to seek structured discussions in the House failed. According to the party, their members were not given sufficient time to speak, while notices for debates and adjournment motions were repeatedly disallowed.

The Opposition has also accused the government of using procedural tools to avoid scrutiny during the Budget Session, particularly on economic and governance-related issues. They maintain that the Speaker’s decisions have tilted proceedings in favour of the ruling party, prompting them to take the unprecedented step.

Government dismisses allegations

Leaders from the ruling side have rejected the Opposition’s allegations, calling the no-confidence motion a political tactic aimed at disrupting parliamentary functioning. They argue that the Speaker has followed established rules and procedures and that repeated adjournments are a result of Opposition protests rather than any bias from the Chair.

Government representatives have urged Opposition members to allow the House to function smoothly, stating that important legislative and budgetary matters remain pending.

What happens next

Under parliamentary rules, a no-confidence motion against the Speaker follows a defined procedure and is subject to scrutiny before being admitted for discussion. The Speaker’s office is expected to examine the notice and outline the next steps in accordance with parliamentary norms.

The development has added to the already tense atmosphere in Parliament, with both sides holding firm to their positions. As the Budget Session progresses, all eyes will be on how the standoff unfolds and whether normal proceedings can resume in the coming days.